Contribution
by Ibrahim Coulibaly on the volatility of agricultural prices,
CFS,
19 October 2011
Around 40 years
ago,
when I was young, we did not speak of volatility. I still
remember
how our government gave our parents ploughs, plough oxen, and
fertilizer on credit. At the time, there was a public service,
the
OPAM, that bought food products from farming families at
prices that
were known beforehand.
Around 30 years
ago,
I was in secondary school and we were told that it was better
to
produce for external markets. We began hearing the phrase
“deterioration of the terms of exchange” in the discourse of
our
male politicians.
This was a true lament at the time, but it found no echo anywhere. What did it refer to? The prices of export agricultural products were collapsing on the international market. The governments of the time had made the fatal error of encouraging family farmers to produce more export products. When things went wrong, these farmers alone paid the heavy price.
This was a true lament at the time, but it found no echo anywhere. What did it refer to? The prices of export agricultural products were collapsing on the international market. The governments of the time had made the fatal error of encouraging family farmers to produce more export products. When things went wrong, these farmers alone paid the heavy price.
The collapse of
our
economies and the growth of the public debt in the 1980’s led
the
World Bank and the International Monetary Fund to subject our
countries to structural adjustment.
We were told
that
the state was inefficient and that we needed to make more room
for
the private sector. At the same time, our states were forced
to go
even deeper into debt to restore macro-economic balances. We
were
told to cut all support to sustainable family farming, which
was
termed unsuccessful. Then the World Bank and its allies
launched a
true demolition campaign against this type of agriculture.
We were told to
produce even more cash crops for export, such as cotton,
coffee and
peanuts, at very low prices that were set abroad. With these
slogans
we were told to buy rice from Asia, or flour and dried milk
from
Europe, all of which are now so volatile. The descent into
hell had
begun for farming families and for our over-indebted states
that were
incapable of paying.
Then we were
told to
become competitive according to the criteria of international
financial institutions, and also that our states were no
longer
authorized to protect us. Our customs tariffs were dismantled
and our
markets, liberalized. Food products from elsewhere were
unloaded onto
our markets, making us even more vulnerable to price
volatility.
Eating habits changed in our cities; the food produced by
farming
families no longer sold. In West Africa this phenomenon was
aggravated by the advent of the West African Economic and
Monetary
Union (WAEMU) and its Common External Tariff, known as the
lowest
customs tariff in the world.
And yet none of
these “solutions” imposed on us pulled us out of poverty. On
the
contrary, we became even more vulnerable. This is the context
in
which family farming is asked to be successful.
Today, we are
subjected to new challenges that are falling from the skies.
Climate
change, financial speculation, unpredictable international
markets,
new policies by developed countries that grab our land to
produce
fuels. We no longer hear anything about all of these issues,
even
though they lie at the heart of the volatility that is
currently
being discussed.
Instead of
addressing the causes of our poverty and of the volatility, we
have
seen complete catalogues of projects and programmes financed
in the
name of the rural sector. Billions of dollars are mobilized
every
year but the reality is that more than half of the farming
families
in most of our countries cannot find 1,000 dollars to pay for
a
plough, a couple of oxen, a cart or a donkey (see the study by
the
FAO on agricultural mechanization in Mali).
The high panel
of
experts should be commissioned to study the efficiency of what
is
mobilized in the name of the poor. When several hundreds of
millions
of dollars are mobilized, how much makes it to the fields of
the poor
and of the women, who are so often mentioned? You would be
surprised
by the results of such a study. Or maybe not. Considering how
long
they have been mobilizing all these millions in our name, we
clearly
should have all been rich by now.
In spite of all
of
this, and without any aid, any protection whatsoever, and with
all
the powerful of the world against it, sustainable family
farming has
not disappeared.
Unfortunately
we had
to suffer the current crisis for our governments to become
once again
aware of the necessity for food security based on food
production at
the national level. However, sustainable solutions are not yet
in
sight.
To solve the
problem
of price volatility, we the sustainable family farmers, with
the
support of other actors in civil society, believe that it is
necessary:
← To give
priority
to our local markets and regional integration, rather than let
our
prices be dictated by remote and unpredictable international
markets.
This is the only solution that will enable us, family farmers,
to
feed ourselves, our communities and our cities.
← To halt all
forms of competition between farmers and production modes with
a very
large disparity in productivity (the hoe against the tractor
plus the
subsidy is a tall order). One does not have the right to tell
us that
we will eat when we have become competitive.
← To stop the
policies which are destabilizing our systems of sustainable
family
farming. In times of overproduction we suffer from dumping, in
times
of shortage we suffer from restrictions on the export of food
we have
been told to no longer produce.
← Our
governments
must aspire to policies that will pull us out of poverty and
destitution, protect our systems of sustainable family farming
from
volatile markets, and support us so that we can invest to feed
our
populations.
← We know what
needs doing. Instruments exist to stabilize prices:
appropriate
customs tariffs, strategic stocks at different levels, the
management
of offer and demand, and regulations against speculators. In
the name
of whom is the World Trade Organization forbidding us from
doing
this?
← Sustainable
family farmers, women and vulnerable groups in rural areas
must be
granted real access to the funds mobilized in their name so
they can
buy agricultural equipment, fertilizers
and
seeds, and create value with their products so they can
finally begin
to live with dignity from their work.
To finish, I
want to
encourage each of you when we sit in front our plates of food
this
lunchtime, to meditate and recall that human beings are dying
of
hunger and malnutrition at this very moment because costly
meetings
are organized around their fate but without the actions that
could
save them being carried out. We can no longer wait.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire